Our Quality Methodology

Step 1 – Document Analysis and Translator Assignment

Before a single word is translated, the project manager assigned to your matter reviews the source document in full. This initial review serves four purposes, each of which directly affects the quality of the final translation.

The first is to identify the legal framework governing the document — the jurisdiction, the applicable area of law, and any regulatory or institutional context that determines how the translation must read. A contract governed by English law and one governed by French civil law require different translation approaches, even if they cover similar subject matter.

The second is to identify any specific terminology requirements — defined terms, technical nomenclature, or client preferences established in previous projects — and to retrieve or begin building the terminology glossary that will govern the translation throughout.

The third is to confirm the certification requirements applicable to the project. A translation intended for submission to the Home Office or UK Visas and Immigration requires a Statement of Truth formatted to their specific standards. One prepared for use in proceedings before His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service carries its own evidentiary requirements. A translation for a foreign civil law jurisdiction may require additional formalities, including legalisation or apostille. We confirm these requirements before work begins.

The fourth — and most consequential — is translator assignment. Project managers at Jurilingua do not assign documents on the basis of availability. They assign on the basis of qualification match: the translator whose legal expertise, technical background, and language specialisation best fit the specific document in hand. A pharmaceutical patent is assigned to a translator with a scientific degree in the relevant discipline. A document governed by Mexican law goes to a translator with Mexican legal training. A financial regulatory filing goes to a translator whose practice is centred on the relevant regulatory framework. This matching process is where most of the quality work in legal translation happens — before translation begins.

Step 2 – Translation Against a Managed Terminology Glossary

Translation is performed by the assigned specialist working against the project glossary — a managed terminology reference that ensures consistent rendering of defined terms, technical concepts, party names, and any client-specific language preferences across the document and, over time, across all related projects.

For new clients, the glossary is built from the source document itself and from any reference materials or instructions the client provides. For established clients, the glossary is retrieved from our terminology database and updated as each new project introduces new terms. Over time, this database becomes a cumulative record of the client’s legal language in every language pair we work in — improving consistency and accuracy across every subsequent instruction.

All translators translate exclusively into their native language. Where a provision in the source document has no precise equivalent in the target legal system — or where a literal translation would produce a meaning that diverges from the legal intent of the original — the translator flags this for review before delivery. These instances are documented and, where appropriate, accompanied by a translator’s note explaining the issue and the approach taken.

Step 3 – Independent Review

Every completed translation is reviewed by a second qualified linguist — a translator working in the same language pair who had no involvement in producing the first draft. This independent review is not a cursory check. It is a full professional pass by a specialist who reads the translated text against the source document with three specific objectives.

The first is accuracy: does the translation faithfully represent every material element of the source? Defined terms, numerical figures, dates, party names, and operative provisions are checked individually.

The second is terminological consistency: is every defined term rendered identically throughout the document and in accordance with the client glossary? A variation that appears minor within a single document can become a significant ambiguity when the same term appears in a related agreement, a court submission, or a regulatory filing months later.

The third is register and style: does the translation read with the appropriate formality and drafting conventions of the target language’s legal context? A translated contract should read as a contract drafted in the target language — not as a translated document.

Any discrepancies identified by the reviewer are reconciled with the translator before the document proceeds to the final stage.

Step 4 – Final Quality Control and Delivery

The project manager conducts a final review of the delivery package before release. This stage is not a re-reading of the translation, that is the reviewer’s responsibility. It is a structured verification of the complete deliverable: does the Statement of Truth, where applicable, contain all required elements in the correct format for the intended authority? Does the document layout accurately reproduce the structure of the original where required? Is the terminology glossary updated to capture any new terms introduced in this project?

Only when these checks are complete is the translation released to the client. The project manager remains your point of contact for any questions following delivery and can provide documentation of the translator’s credentials and the review process for any submission where this is requested by the receiving authority.

What This Process Means in Practice

The result of this four-step process is a legal translation that can be relied upon in the context for which it was produced — submitted to a court, filed with a regulatory authority, executed as part of a transaction, or used as the evidentiary foundation of an immigration application.

It is also a process that compounds in value over time. The terminology database grows with each project. The translator’s familiarity with your documents deepens. The project manager’s understanding of your preferences becomes more precise. For solicitors, barristers, and in-house counsel with recurring translation requirements, this accumulated institutional knowledge means that every subsequent project is faster, more consistent, and more accurately calibrated to your practice than the one before it.

Our quality process is aligned with ISO 17100 standards for translation services.

This is what we mean when we describe Jurilingua as a long-term professional partner rather than a per-project vendor. The process is not designed for one-off instructions. It is designed to grow in value across the course of a professional relationship.

Learn about our translators